The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issues a decision on a “Question of First Impression

On December 20, 2019 the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued a decision on a “Question of First Impression” involving the time deadline to file a Joinder Petition. In Sota Construction Services, Inc. v. WCAB (Czarnecki et al), No. 87 C.D. 2019 (Decided 12/20/19).

As with any field of law, the Workers’ Compensation Act imposes time deadlines for pursuing a claim – or the right is “extinguished”. Generally, a Claim Petition must be filed within three years of the date of injury (with some exceptions), or the claim will be barred by a legal doctrine called laches. Sect. 315 of the Act, 77 PS §602. Once a party begins a contest by filing a petition, another party may file a Petition for Joinder – to add another party to the case. For example, where the claimant works for a subcontractor on a large construction project overseen by a General Contractor, the injured worker might file their claim against the subcontractor who pays their salary, and directs their work. If that business does not have workers compensation insurance (a felony, by the way), the subcontractor, the claimant or even the Uninsured Employer’s Guarantee Fund (UEGF) may file a Joinder petition against the General Contractor.

Pursuant to the Regulations implemented by the Bureau of Workers Compensation (BWC), a Joinder Petition must be filed within 20 days of the evidence providing notice to the involved parties that some other, not included party, should be ‘joined’ to the claim. 34 Pa Code §131.6(h). Once filed, the original claim is deemed amended, such that relief may be awarded against the ‘joined party’ as if included in the original petition.

In Sota Construction, the claimant filed his claim petition very near the 3 year deadline. The evidence providing information upon which to base the Joinder Petition was not developed until AFTER the 3 year deadline had passed. The Court, relying on the Rules of Statutory Construction, 1 PS § 1901 et seq. found that the rules could be rendered meaningless, and absurd by a claimant intentionally waiting until the deadline, making it practically impossible for a named defendant to ‘join’ other unnamed defendants. Distinguishing other cases addressing ‘similar” questions, the Court relied on the language of claimant’s petition, clearly revealing the Joinder pertained to the same work incident alleged in the original petition – and did not give rise to ‘joining’ parties involved on different dates with other injuries. It was all one-in-the-same cause of action.

The Court addressing an issue of First Impression more than 100 years after the Workers’ Compensation Act became law demonstrates the need to be represented by an attorney who focuses their practice on this unique and highly specialized field of law – to be informed and up to date on the ever changing court decisions that can and likely will impact your claim – YOU RIGHTS. Every work injury lawyer at Schmidt, Kirifides & Rassias are Certified Workers’ Compensation Specialists, pursuant to the stringent requirements, testing and years of service required by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania and the PA Bar Ass’n Rules to earn this certification. We KNOW the law, and will aggressively fight to protect your rights. We know YOUR CASE. Many firms pass clients from lawyer to another, based on what is convenient for the lawyer. SKR works as a team, with every lawyer knowing the details that make a difference to your claim. You will never be treated like a small fish in a big pond. You will get personal, compassionate epresentation.

For a FREE consultation, call us at 610-892-9300 or online at www.SKR.legal

Mark R. Schmidt settles the case of a 61 year old convenience store clerk from Havertown for $100,000

The claimant was injured while lifting a case of beverages to place on the shelves, when he felt a sharp pain in his back and fell. Despite the incident being witnessed by the store owner, the insurance company denied the claim.

Mark R. Schmidt settles the case of a 39 year old welder from Wilmington Delaware, injured while working in Kennett Square Pennsylvania

Workers’ Compensation is one of the few fields of law that offer a Specialist Certification for lawyers who meet the strict requirements, which include years of practice dedicated to workers compensation claims, Continuing Legal Education and written testing.

Work injury lawyer Mark R. Schmidt settled the claim of a 25 year old solar panel installation foreman from Brookhaven, Delaware County

The insurance company fought his right to any workers’ compensation benefits, and fired him for ‘made up’ reasons – but likely just because he sought to protect his rights. Attorney Schmidt was unconcerned, and fought – and WON the claim.

Workers’ Compensation lawyer Mark R. Schmidt settled the claim of a 56 year old swimming pool laborer from Malvern, Chester County

The insurance company defined his injury as a sprain or strain, but the real injury was more severe. Workers’ Compensation lawyer Mark R. Schmidt settled the claim successfully!

Certified Workers’ Compensation Specialist lawyer Mark R. Schmidt resolved the claim of a 29 year old cable technician

The injured worker was disabled for approximately 1 month, and had undergone a brief course of physical therapy. The insurance company denied his claim, alleging he did not suffer any injuries.

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issues a decision on a “Question of First Impression

The Court addressed an issue of First Impression more than 100 years after the Workers’ Compensation Act became law demonstrates the need to be represented by an attorney who focuses their practice on this unique and highly specialized field of law.

EnglishSpanish